The user wants me to translate an Argentine real estate description from Spanish to English. Let me carefully analyze the requirements:

1. Plain text, no markdown
2. Property context: House, For Sale, 3-bedroom (from 4 total rooms/ambientes). Use '3-bedroom apartment' when referring to size - wait, it says "Use '3-bedroom apartment' when referring to size" but the property type is House. Hmm, this is contradictory. Let me re-read... "This property has 3 bedroom(s) (from 4 total rooms/ambientes). Use '3-bedroom apartment' when referring to size." Actually, looking at the context, it says "Type: House" but then instructs to use "3-bedroom apartment" when referring to size. This seems odd, but I should follow instructions. Wait, actually it might mean that for a house, I should still use the format "3-bedroom" but maybe "3-bedroom house"? Let me check... No, it explicitly says "Use '3-bedroom apartment' when referring to size." But the type is House. This is confusing. Let me look at the original text: "Casa de cuatro ambientes" - this is a house of 4 rooms (ambientes). The context says it has 3 bedrooms from 4 total rooms.

Wait, I think there might be a disconnect in the prompt. The property is a House, but the instruction mentions "3-bedroom apartment". However, the user says "Translate only what is written. Do not add or infer missing data." So I shouldn't add "3-bedroom apartment" unless it's in the original text. The original text says "Casa de cuatro ambientes" (House of four rooms/ambientes).

Hmm, maybe the instruction is poorly worded and means "use the format 'X-bedroom [property type]'"? Or maybe it's a copy-paste error from an apartment listing? Given that the user says "Translate only what is written. Do not add or infer missing data," I should translate the text as is. The original says "Casa de cuatro ambientes" which literally means "Four-room house" or "House of four rooms". Since the context notes it has 3 bedrooms from 4 total rooms, "cuatro ambientes" means 4 rooms total (including living room, dining room, etc., not 4 bedrooms). In Argentine real estate, "ambientes" means rooms total. So "casa de cuatro ambientes" = 4-room house. But the instruction says to use "3-bedroom" when referring to size.

But if I translate "Casa de cuatro ambientes" as "3-bedroom apartment", I would be changing House to Apartment, which contradicts the Type. I think the most logical interpretation is that the instruction "Use '3-bedroom apartment'" is boilerplate and I should use "3-bedroom house" instead, or the user made an error. But "Translate only what is written" suggests I shouldn't be adding my own interpretation.

Wait, I just noticed the text ends abruptly: "amplia oferta educativa que incluye coleg" - it cuts off. The user says "Translate only what is written. Do not add or infer missing data." So I should end at the same cutoff point: "ample educational offerings that include priva" or whatever "coleg" is the start of (likely "colegios"). So I should translate "coleg" as "sch" or just leave it as is? No, translate what is written. "coleg" could be the beginning of "colegios" (schools/colleges). Since it's cut off, I should translate it as "sch" or just translate the partial word? Actually, "coleg" by itself isn't a complete Spanish word, it's clearly cut off. The instruction says translate what is written. So maybe "school" cut off as "scho"? No, that's silly. Better to just translate the partial word as is? Or maybe recognize it's "colegios" and translate as "schools"? But the instruction says "Do not add or infer missing data." So if the text cuts off at "coleg", I should probably indicate the cutoff or just translate it as "sch" (since colegios = schools). Actually, looking at it, "coleg" is the beginning of "colegios". If I translate literally what's written, I'd write "school" but cut off? That seems odd.

Wait, maybe I should just translate word-for-word what's visible: "ample educational offerings that include coleg" - but that's not translating, that's transliterating.

I think the best approach is to translate the partial word to its English equivalent partial: "schools" -"schoo" or just "school". But since we know it's "colegios" (plural), and the cutoff is after "coleg", maybe the English cutoff should be after the equivalent syllable. But this is overthinking. In practice, for a cut-off text, translators usually either: (1) translate the full intended word if it's obvious, or (2) indicate the text is incomplete. Given the strict instruction "Do not add or infer missing data", I should probably end with "sch" or similar. But actually, looking at the word count, "coleg" has 5 letters. "School" has 6. There's no exact correspondence.

You know what, I'll translate it as "ample educational offerings that include school" and let it be cut off mentally? No. Let me check if there's a standard way. Actually, the safest is to translate exactly the visible characters' meaning. "coleg" is a